Self-Adjusting Spine Support

Built a scanner? Started to build a scanner? Record your progress here. Doesn't need to be a whole scanner - triggers and other parts are fine. Commercial scanners are fine too.

Re: Self-Adjusting Spine Support

Postby rob » 03 May 2012, 13:24

bonesgeorge, just a quick correction in terminology. The platen is the glass. The entire thing that holds the book is the cradle, and we've been calling the sides of the cradle "wings".

daniel_reetz wrote:Wow, some very interesting design improvements indeed. Bonesgeorge, how does your new cradle account for books with varying thickness? I can't see an adjustment - maybe I'm misunderstanding things. Thanks for the great pictures.


Here's my understanding of the mechanism:

The two wings are independent, and the amount they are separated by is determined by the length of the string underneath holding them together. The elastic cords pull the wings apart, so that the string is always taut, and the separation is maintained. To change the spacing, the string's length is adjusted.
The Singularity is Near. ~ http://halfbakedmaker.org ~ Follow me as I build the world's first all-mechanical steam-powered computer.
User avatar
rob
 
Posts: 770
Joined: 03 Jun 2009, 13:50
Location: Maryland, United States

Re: Self-Adjusting Spine Support

Postby daniel_reetz » 03 May 2012, 13:30

rob wrote:The two wings are independent, and the amount they are separated by is determined by the length of the string underneath holding them together. The elastic cords pull the wings apart, so that the string is always taut, and the separation is maintained. To change the spacing, the string's length is adjusted.


Gawds, it's simpler and smarter than I imagined. I have to cut one this weekend.
User avatar
daniel_reetz
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: 03 Jun 2009, 13:56

Re: Self-Adjusting Spine Support

Postby jck57 » 03 May 2012, 13:46

Beautiful renderings, bonesgeorge! Your work got my wheels turning. Here's still another idea for attaching the skate bearings to the tables. The 5/16" x 2" bolts and nuts are off the hackerspace scanner material list. The bearing assembly is a press fit between the threaded portions of the bolts and the groove in the ply. The 1/4" hole through the top is so you can remove the assembly with a punch.

IMG_1054.JPG
IMG_1054.JPG (97.1 KiB) Viewed 532 times


IMG_1055.JPG
IMG_1055.JPG (74.07 KiB) Viewed 532 times


IMG_1057.JPG
IMG_1057.JPG (74.56 KiB) Viewed 532 times


IMG_1059.JPG
IMG_1059.JPG (76.51 KiB) Viewed 532 times
jck57
 
Posts: 299
Joined: 23 Nov 2009, 15:21

Re: Self-Adjusting Spine Support

Postby bonesgeorge » 03 May 2012, 13:57

daniel_reetz wrote:
rob wrote:The two wings are independent, and the amount they are separated by is determined by the length of the string underneath holding them together. The elastic cords pull the wings apart, so that the string is always taut, and the separation is maintained. To change the spacing, the string's length is adjusted.


Gawds, it's simpler and smarter than I imagined. I have to cut one this weekend.


Sorry guys, its gonna be me! This is not my own built, its based on jck57's new cradle and wings :roll: . What, in turn, I wanted to contribute with is basically a more material efficient plan for fundamentally the same cradle with "self-adjusting spine support".

I mainly reduced the material usage, in my hopes, to the less till it is possibly able to function the same. So the honor goes to jck, I just jot down my ideas how to be the most efficient as I cam consider.

Daniel, I'll look around for the drawings I made with the figures regarding the. thickness and other dimensions.

Till than, I suggest to take a look at the the picture I shadowed with a proportioned plan of the wing stands that shows good how much less ply we need to basically do the very same!
bonesgeorge
 
Posts: 25
Joined: 25 Mar 2012, 13:38

Re: Self-Adjusting Spine Support

Postby bonesgeorge » 03 May 2012, 14:14

jck57 wrote:Beautiful renderings, bonesgeorge! Your work got my wheels turning. Here's still another idea for attaching the skate bearings to the tables. The 5/16" x 2" bolts and nuts are off the hackerspace scanner material list. The bearing assembly is a press fit between the threaded portions of the bolts and the groove in the ply. The 1/4" hole through the top is so you can remove the assembly with a punch.


I'm really happy that especially you like it! I'll get to my builds Monday, and I'll make some photos too.

EDITED


Jck57, I got it! :) The ply wouldn't have been thick enough for the classic screwing, and you fixed the problem! Kudos to you! :)

(I'm actually quite amazed to see photos taken of the sunk bearings I posted just a few hours ago.. :D )
Last edited by bonesgeorge on 03 May 2012, 14:51, edited 1 time in total.
bonesgeorge
 
Posts: 25
Joined: 25 Mar 2012, 13:38

Re: Self-Adjusting Spine Support

Postby bonesgeorge » 03 May 2012, 14:22

daniel_reetz wrote:We are definitely a model community in this regard. I am extremely grateful to everyone for keeping up such a high standard of contribution and for sharing so freely for the last three years. Really incredible.


So, is there any other community that is to create some other machines, or anyrhing all together, or it's your own idea you have done with Rob?
bonesgeorge
 
Posts: 25
Joined: 25 Mar 2012, 13:38

Re: Self-Adjusting Spine Support

Postby daniel_reetz » 03 May 2012, 14:45

Yep, there are other communities - RepRap is probably most like us, a lot of people working together in an open source way toward shared goals... they work on 3D printing technology. CNCZone.com has some forums for people developing CNC routers and mills which operate in a similar way.

Edit: but I've spent a lot of time in other communities and forums, and I have to say, our level of discourse, fairly constant good will and good member behavior, as well as the sheer number of user contributions here - very high compared to the average. People from outside often comment on it when contacting me. Of course they often also comment on the difficulty of searching the forums, etc - we have our own set of problems that we're working on.
User avatar
daniel_reetz
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: 03 Jun 2009, 13:56

Re: Self-Adjusting Spine Support

Postby jck57 » 03 May 2012, 14:52

jk57, could you confirm my sketches about the wings' bearing track were entirely understandable?


Yes, I think I understand.

In my own design I tried to balance material weight, structural strength, and minimum machining time. Is 6 pounds is too heavy?

Thanks for sharing your ideas.
jck57
 
Posts: 299
Joined: 23 Nov 2009, 15:21

Re: Self-Adjusting Spine Support

Postby bonesgeorge » 03 May 2012, 15:03

daniel_reetz wrote:Yep, there are other communities - RepRap is probably most like us, a lot of people working together in an open source way toward shared goals... they work on 3D printing technology. CNCZone.com has some forums for people developing CNC routers and mills which operate in a similar way.

Edit: but I've spent a lot of time in other communities and forums, and I have to say, our level of discourse, fairly constant good will and good member behavior, as well as the sheer number of user contributions here - very high compared to the average. People from outside often comment on it when contacting me. Of course they often also comment on the difficulty of searching the forums, etc - we have our own set of problems that we're working on.


Still a model to follow! :)

The thickness, if we want it strong we need it thick obviously; I don't yet know what thick exactly, or how narrow we can go, but I'm sure 1" is strong enough.

So, the main cross member, the bigger one holding together the wings should be about 1/2" and the stand has to support it with a part of same thickness, 1/2", making 1 all together.

For the other dimensions I'll get back later when I got home to my computer -- now I'm suffering with my cellphone in my hand..
bonesgeorge
 
Posts: 25
Joined: 25 Mar 2012, 13:38

Re: Self-Adjusting Spine Support

Postby bonesgeorge » 03 May 2012, 15:27

jck57 wrote:
jk57, could you confirm my sketches about the wings' bearing track were entirely understandable?


Yes, I think I understand.

In my own design I tried to balance material weight, structural strength, and minimum machining time. Is 6 pounds is too heavy?

Thanks for sharing your ideas.


I wasn't quite sure, the drawings of that part are really poor in detail, but the solution was just fine!
bonesgeorge
 
Posts: 25
Joined: 25 Mar 2012, 13:38

PreviousNext

Return to Scanners and Build Threads

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests