0.9.9.2: Input File Type Correlated to Output Image Quality?

[univurshul]

After some testing, I've discovered that the input file-type is correlated (a direct result) to the image quality of the output TIFF.

For example, after exporting a RAW file from my image editor as an uncompressed TIFF for input to Scan Tailor, I noticed that is was noticeably less quality/resolution/detail than a basic JPEG-export (same image).

Not only did the JPEG process better in terms of detail/quality, it processed faster within Scan Tailor. (Important: all settings were identical when processed within Scan Tailor).

So, if one input file-type works better than another in Scan Tailor, which one works the very best?

Possibly someone can expand on why this is so. (I will post some examples later this evening.)

[Tulon]

Might be a DPI issue. There is a check box in the New Project dialog to force Scan Tailor into DPI fixing mode. You can check if they are the same in both cases.

Slower processing is expected, as it just takes longer to load a huge uncompressed image, though quality degradation is not.

[univurshul]

Yeah, DPI was manually fixed at 180x180 for every file-type in a single project.

When I get back to my lab tonight I'll illustrate what I'm seeing. It's quite interesting. I have 3 separate image editors as well; I will double check one app isn't generating low quality TIFFs when it specifies it's fully uncompressed.

[univurshul]

It appears the issue is not Scan Tailor--it is a problem with the output feature of a particular image editor as noted below:

1.jpg (96.12 KiB) Viewed 1045 times

While I tested these different image-types within a single project, it appears ST auto-fields picture zones more accurately with properly exported TIFF files vs. other file formats:

2.jpg (72.95 KiB) Viewed 1045 times

I haven't placed any of the output images under a loupe because I can conclude that the fundamentals of large TIFF files still apply.

[univurshul]

Tulon, I did have a question for you:

Scan Tailor output TIFFs are always 8 bit depth.

(All screens only use 8bit output, whether you set it to 8bit or 16bit. Almost all printers use 8bit output, whether you set it to 8bit or 16bit.)

Is there any benefit to export 16 bit images for input into Scan Tailor? Would a higher bit TIFF sent into ST render better results or is this unnecessary?

[Tulon]

Scan Tailor output TIFFs are always 8 bit depth.

Not entirely true. For B/W output mode it's 1 bit, for other modes it's either 8, 24 or even 32 bits if the original image had colors or maybe even transparency. It never goes beyond 8 bit per channel though.

Is there any benefit to export 16 bit images for input into Scan Tailor? Would a higher bit TIFF sent into ST render better results or is this unnecessary?

There is no benefit. As all internal processing is done in 8 bits per channel, the very first thing that's done to an input image is converting it to that format.

[univurshul]

Thanks. --Excellent to keep in mind.