DIY Book Scanner

Posted: **04 Apr 2016, 11:40**

These are the same build errors I reported above. See Tulon's response - it looks like they should be easy to fix and that we can hope for that soon. Waiting a few days for a real fix is likely better than applying my duct-tape style patch that probably will gum things up and cause unnecessary headaches.

Posted: **04 Apr 2016, 14:00**

I pushed a fix for build errors. Also, -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=-std=c++11 should no longer be required.

I am still working on a fix for OpenCL crashes, trying to solve performance degradation issues caused by it.

Posted: **05 Apr 2016, 15:57**

I pushed the fix for OpenCL crashes.

Posted: **08 Apr 2016, 16:05**

Hm... FYI, now I get this when running make on the latest commit:

Code: Select all


/Users/admin/Desktop/scantailor-experimental/acceleration/opencl/BinaryRasterOp.cpp:133:15: error: 
      no matching function for call to 'min'
                h_wg_size = std::min(h_wg_size, local_mem_size / sizeof(...
                            ^~~~~~~~
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../include/c++/v1/algorithm:2589:1: note: 
      candidate template ignored: deduced conflicting types for parameter '_Tp'
      ('unsigned long' vs. 'unsigned long long')
min(const _Tp& __a, const _Tp& __b)
^
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../include/c++/v1/algorithm:2599:1: note: 
      candidate template ignored: could not match
      'initializer_list<type-parameter-0-0>' against 'unsigned long'
min(initializer_list<_Tp> __t, _Compare __comp)
^
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../include/c++/v1/algorithm:2581:1: note: 
      candidate function template not viable: requires 3 arguments, but 2 were
      provided
min(const _Tp& __a, const _Tp& __b, _Compare __comp)
^
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../include/c++/v1/algorithm:2607:1: note: 
      candidate function template not viable: requires single argument '__t',
      but 2 arguments were provided
min(initializer_list<_Tp> __t)
^
/Users/admin/Desktop/scantailor-experimental/acceleration/opencl/BinaryRasterOp.cpp:139:15: error: 
      no matching function for call to 'min'
                v_wg_size = std::min(v_wg_size, local_mem_size / ((h_wg_...
                            ^~~~~~~~
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../include/c++/v1/algorithm:2589:1: note: 
      candidate template ignored: deduced conflicting types for parameter '_Tp'
      ('unsigned long' vs. 'unsigned long long')
min(const _Tp& __a, const _Tp& __b)
^
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../include/c++/v1/algorithm:2599:1: note: 
      candidate template ignored: could not match
      'initializer_list<type-parameter-0-0>' against 'unsigned long'
min(initializer_list<_Tp> __t, _Compare __comp)
^
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../include/c++/v1/algorithm:2581:1: note: 
      candidate function template not viable: requires 3 arguments, but 2 were
      provided
min(const _Tp& __a, const _Tp& __b, _Compare __comp)
^
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../include/c++/v1/algorithm:2607:1: note: 
      candidate function template not viable: requires single argument '__t',
      but 2 arguments were provided
min(initializer_list<_Tp> __t)
^
4 warnings and 2 errors generated.
make[2]: *** [acceleration/opencl/CMakeFiles/opencl.dir/BinaryRasterOp.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [acceleration/opencl/CMakeFiles/opencl.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
TK:scantailor-experimental admin$

Posted: **08 Apr 2016, 18:36**

louiscan wrote:Hm... FYI, now I get this when running make on the latest commit:

Should be fixed now.

Posted: **18 Apr 2016, 04:06**

How to use experimental cli 64bit with multithreading? Cant see parameter in -h.

thanks

Posted: **05 May 2016, 03:14**

Is there a link to the page that ALLWAYS shows the latest version of STE?

Is this the one?
https://github.com/Tulon/scantailor/releases
Is the latest version from 22 february 2016?

I have some problems but i must be sure that i use the last version of the program.

Posted: **05 May 2016, 09:52**

tuf wrote:Is there a link to the page that ALLWAYS shows the latest version of STE?

Is this the one?
https://github.com/Tulon/scantailor/releases

Yes, the latest release should always be at the top of that page. The latest version is indeed the one from 22 february 2016.

Posted: **07 May 2016, 05:11**

This is an image that crashes the program:
http://www.mediafire.com/download/44s7e ... ge_003.zip

1. It happens if you manually split the image in 2 pages.
In order to crash the program, load the image and then go straight to the splitting menu, and select the double page.

2. Another error is the out of memory issue (i use the 64 bit version on 6 GB RAM, without swap file).
In order to crash the program: run the Fix Orientation option, the jump to the Output option and run it.
The CPU stays at 26%, but the RAM usage went through the roof: 3300 MB.

Posted: **07 May 2016, 06:44**

I could not reproduce the crash or the out-of-memory situation so far. Do you have OpenGL / OpenCL enabled? Does it still crash with those disabled?

The out-of-memory situation on 64-bit systems is usually caused by Qt's limitation of 2GB per image that's in place even in 64bit builds. Your image is huge (18000x18000 px), yet it doesn't break the 2GB limit, even with 2x resolution enhancement factor. However, if the image in question was color rather than grayscale, it would have broken that limit.

DIY Book Scanner

Scan Tailor "Experimental"

Re: Scan Tailor "Experimental"

Re: Scan Tailor "Experimental"

Re: Scan Tailor "Experimental"

Re: Scan Tailor "Experimental"

Re: Scan Tailor "Experimental"

Re: Scan Tailor "Experimental"

Re: Scan Tailor "Experimental"

Re: Scan Tailor "Experimental"

Re: Scan Tailor "Experimental"

Re: Scan Tailor "Experimental"